Transfer-Step2-Catalogs のバックアップ(No.10)

Catalog of 6184 IA-excess candidates selected in Step 2: Step2.dat †

(2015/08/16) Note:
- AGN flags for Chandra, XMM, and VLA are not complete yet.
- ID=1968804 is absent because of the absence of its EAZY output.
- For the 43 candidates whose Subaru i'-band magnitudes are saturated (i.e., i' < 21 ABmag in the original photometric catalog), EAZY results should be revised because wrongly corrected CFHT i* magnitudes are assigned for them: the ID list of these 43 candidates Step1_iband_replaced_candidates.dat

format (written as headers in the above catalog):

# (1)ID (2,3)RA,DEC(J2000)[deg]
# (4--19)quantities from photo-z catalog:
#  --- (4,5,6)median,1sigma lower,1sigma upper limits of photo-z measured using the galaxy templates[zPDF,zPDF_l68,zPDF_u68]
#  --- (7)best fit template at zPDF[1--8:Ell-S0, 9--15:Sa-Sc, 16--19:Sd-Sdm from Polletta et al., >=20:starburst from BC03]
#  --- (8)best-fit additional extinction E(B-V) at zPDF[mag]
#  --- (9)extinction law[1:prevot, 2:Calzetti, 3,4:Calzetti+2175bump]
#  --- (10)number of filters used in the fit
#  --- (11)best-fit BC03 model (12)best-fit model age[yr] (13)best-fit model extinction E(B-V)[mag]
#  --- (14,15,16)log10[Mstar/Msun] for median,1sigma lower,1sigma upper[mass_med,mass_inf,mass_sup] 
#  --- (17,18,19)log10[SFR/(Msun/yr)] for median,1sigma lower,1sigma upper[sfr_med,sfr_inf,sfr_sup]
# (20+2i,21+2i)mag,1sigma error of mag corrected for Galactic extinction and offset[i=0--36]:
#  --- i= 0 (20,21)CFHT u*
#  --- i= 1 (22,23)Subaru B
#  --- i= 2 (24,25)Subaru V
#  --- i= 3 (26,27)Subaru g'
#  --- i= 4 (28,29)Subaru r'
#  --- i= 5 (30,31)Subaru i'
#  --- i= 6 (32,33)CFHT i*
#  --- i= 7 (34,35)Subaru z'
#  --- i= 8 (36,37)UKIRT J
#  --- i= 9 (38,39)CTIO/KPNO Ks
#  --- i=10 (40,41)CFHT Ks
#  --- i=11 (42,43)Subaru IA427
#  --- i=12 (44,45)Subaru IA464
#  --- i=13 (46,47)Subaru IA484
#  --- i=14 (48,49)Subaru IA505
#  --- i=15 (50,51)Subaru IA527
#  --- i=16 (52,53)Subaru IA574
#  --- i=17 (54,55)Subaru IA624
#  --- i=18 (56,57)Subaru IA679
#  --- i=19 (58,59)Subaru IA709
#  --- i=20 (60,61)Subaru IA738
#  --- i=21 (62,63)Subaru IA767
#  --- i=22 (64,65)Subaru IA827
#  --- i=23 (66,67)Subaru NB711
#  --- i=24 (68,69)Subaru NB816
#  --- i=25 (70,71)Spitzer IRAC ch1
#  --- i=26 (72,73)Spitzer IRAC ch2
#  --- i=27 (74,75)Spitzer IRAC ch3
#  --- i=28 (76,77)Spitzer IRAC ch4
#  --- i=29 (78,79)GALEX FUV
#  --- i=30 (80,81)GALEX NUV
#  --- i=31 (82,83)UltraVISTA Y
#  --- i=32 (84,85)UltraVISTA J
#  --- i=33 (86,87)UltraVISTA H
#  --- i=34 (88,89)UltraVISTA Ks
#  --- i=35 (90,91)CFHT H
#  --- i=36 (92,93)Subaru z''
# (94--99)AGN-related flags:
#  --- (94)flag for detection in all 4 IRAC bands[0:no, 1:yes]
#  --- (95)flags for AGN from IRAC color[Donley+12 criteria][0:non-AGN, 1:AGN]
#  --- (96)flags for AGN from Chandra[0:non-AGN, 1:AGN]
#  --- (97)flags for AGN from XMM-Newton[0:non-AGN, 1:AGN]
#  --- (98)flags for AGN from VLA[0:non-AGN, 1:AGN]
#  --- (99)flags for AGN from one of them[0:non-AGN, 1:AGN]
# (100--148)Step 1 related quantities:
#  --- (100+4i)flag of excess IA band for 12 IA-bands[0:non-excess, others:excess][i=0--11]
#  --- (101+4i)IAc[ABmag][i=0--11]
#  --- (102+4i)IAc-IA[ABmag][i=0--11]
#  --- (103+4i)3sigma(IAc-IA)[ABmag][i=0--11]
#  ------ i= 0 (100,101,102,103)IA427
#  ------ i= 1 (104,105,106,107)IA464
#  ------ i= 2 (108,109,110,111)IA484
#  ------ i= 3 (112,113,114,115)IA505
#  ------ i= 4 (116,117,118,119)IA527
#  ------ i= 5 (120,121,122,123)IA574
#  ------ i= 6 (124,125,126,127)IA624
#  ------ i= 7 (128,129,130,131)IA679
#  ------ i= 8 (132,133,134,135)IA709
#  ------ i= 9 (136,137,138,139)IA738
#  ------ i=10 (140,141,142,143)IA767
#  ------ i=11 (144,145,146,147)IA827
#  --- (148)N_ex^temp
# (149--194)Step 2 related quantities:
#  --- (149)Nsol
#  --- (150--165)quantities related to the primary z_ph solution:
#  ------ (150)P(z_ph)
#  ------ (151)chi_nu^2(z_ph)
#  ------ (152)z_ph
#  ------ (153--164)line ID for 12 IA bands(1:Lya, 2:CIV, 3:CIII], 4:MgII, 5:[OII], 6:[OIII]+Hb, 7:Ha+[NII], 99:others)
#  ------ (165)N_ex^cons
#  --- (166--181)quantities related to the secondary z_ph solution:
#  ------ (166)P(z_ph)
#  ------ (167)chi_nu^2(z_ph)
#  ------ (168)z_ph
#  ------ (169--180)line ID for 12 IA bands(1:Lya, 2:CIV, 3:CIII], 4:MgII, 5:[OII], 6:[OIII]+Hb, 7:Ha+[NII], 99:others)
#  ------ (181)N_ex^cons
#  --- (182--193)flag for 12 IA bands[0:undetected, 1:detected]
#  --- (194)N_undetectedIA

↑

Number Counts of Each Line Emitter Candidates for 12 IA bands †

(2015/08/16):

see the above notes; the following table will be revised

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           IA427 IA464 IA484 IA505 IA527 IA574 IA624 IA679 IA709 IA738 IA767 IA827 Total
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Lya:   244   120   221    99   122    20    20    20     6     8     2     0   882
      CIV:   114    45    68    42    41    38    22     7     9     1     1     2   390
    CIII]:    41    63    65    62    33    13    30    29    27    29    13     7   412
     MgII:    24    28    25    33    33    24    31    64    55    52    30    58   457
    [OII]:    60    58    69    27    30    21    27    41    25    60    48    66   532
[OIII]+Hb:     0     0     9    22    44   100   160   292   324   396   424   582  2353
 Ha+[NII]:     0     0     0     0     0     0     0    20    36    67    60   114   297
   others:    78   154   317   101   151    95   211    51    40    46    36    90  1370
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    total:   561   468   774   386   454   311   501   524   522   659   614   919  6693
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

table:

the above table is found to be wrong on 9th July, 2015

correct counts are the following based on

lineID_150305.txt:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           IA427 IA464 IA484 IA505 IA527 IA574 IA624 IA679 IA709 IA738 IA767 IA827 Total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Lya:   243   119   220    97   122    20    20    20     6     8     2     0   877
      CIV:   114    46    68    43    41    37    21     7     9     1     1     2   390
    CIII]:    41    61    65    61    31    12    29    29    27    30    13     7   406
     MgII:    25    28    26    33    33    24    31    65    55    53    30    58   461
    [OII]:    61    56    68    26    28    21    28    41    25    60    48    66   528
[OIII]+Hb:     0     0     9    22    42   101   160   292   325   395   424   581  2351
 Ha+[NII]:     0     0     0     0     0     0     0    20    36    66    60   112   294
   others:    35    55    56    27    39    30    41    51    39    46    36    28   483
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    total:   519   365   512   309   336   245   330   525   522   659   614   854  5790
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the above counts are found to still include several errors on 10--13th July, 2015. correct counts are the following based on

lineID_150710.txt (19:08 13th July, 2015 from MARK):

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           IA427 IA464 IA484 IA505 IA527 IA574 IA624 IA679 IA709 IA738 IA767 IA827 Total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Lya:   244   119   220    97   122    20    20    20     6     8     2     0   878
      CIV:   114    46    68    43    41    37    21     7     9     1     1     2   390
    CIII]:    41    61    65    61    31    12    29    29    27    30    13     7   406
     MgII:    24    28    26    33    33    24    31    65    55    53    30    58   460
    [OII]:    61    56    68    26    28    21    28    41    25    60    48    66   528
[OIII]+Hb:     0     0     9    22    42   101   160   292   325   395   424   581  2351
 Ha+[NII]:     0     0     0     0     0     0     0    20    36    66    60   112   294
   others:    35    55    56    27    39    30    41    51    39    46    36    28   483
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    total:   519   365   512   309   336   245   330   525   522   659   614   854  5790
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

this table is reproduced if we use the above Step2.txt and the awk script to count the number of individual line emitter candidates of count_Step2.awk

↑

determination of the redshift range for each combination of excess IA band and emission line †

Table: zrange4.txt
Figures:

these redshift ranges of z_min--z_max are calculated using λ_eff +/- FWHM/2 of each IA band and λ_rest of each line
- if z_max < 0, physically there is no chance detecting the emission line with the IA band: in this case, a straight line is inserted in the above table
- if z_max > 0 and z_min < 0, z_min = 0 is adopted in the above table
for single line emitters, z_ph is adopted to be the center of the possible redshift range: that is, z_ph = (z_max + z_min) / 2
- for the lines with z_min > 0, z_ph corresponds to the redshift corresponding to λ_eff
- for [OIII]+Hβ and Hα+[NII] lines, z_max and z_min are evaluated as the redshift at which either one of the lines is out and in the wavelengths of λ +/- FWHM/2 (22:43 9th July, 2015 from Y. Shioya)
for dual and multiple line emitters, z_ph is also adopted to be the center of the possible redshift range in which the combination of the IA-band excesses can be explained as a combination of the redshifted several emission lines
the list of the redshifts assigned to the IA-excess candidates in Step 2 (replaced into the correct list on 14th July, 2015 by MARK and then modified on 20th July, 2015 by MARK) made by using the above Step2.txt and an awk script of make_zph_list.awk: zph_list.txt
- old list is found to (1) suffer from the computational noise caused by coding without an explicit expression for the variables of double precision and (2) fail to assign correct redshift range in which each emission line is included according to the coding to judge the edges of the range (see email from MARK on 19:08 13th July, 2015).