LAEfullpaper のバックアップ(No.20) - PukiWiki

[ トップ ] [ 新規 | 一覧 | 単語検索 | 最終更新 | ヘルプ ]

Action Items Related to LAE Full Paper?
Manuscript?
Figures & Tables?
Fixed Action Items?

Action Items Related to LAE Full Paper †

evaluating the EW(CIV) or EW(CIII]) significance of the following LAE candidates selected in Step 2 with N_ex^cons > 1
- the LAE candidates w/ N_ex^cons = 2:
  1. ID=1237451: (IA427, IA527) = (Lya, CIV) @ z_ph = 2.444
  2. ID= 994378: (IA464, IA709) = (Lya, CIII]) @ z_ph = 2.754
  3. ID= 996586: (IA464, IA738) = (Lya, CIII]) @ z_ph = 2.835
  4. ID=1110706: (IA464, IA574) = (Lya, CIV) @ z_ph = 2.764
  5. ID=1212266: (IA484, IA624) = (Lya, CIV) @ z_ph = 3.002
  6. ID=1260735: (IA484, IA624) = (Lya, CIV) @ z_ph = 3.002
  7. ID= 991118: (IA527, IA679) = (Lya, CIV) @ z_ph = 3.346
- the LAE candidates w/ N_ex^cons = 3:
  1. ID=1199858: (IA484, IA505, IA624) = (Lya, Lya, CIV) @ z_ph = 3.073
- this process is required to confirm whether they are also real emitters in CIV or CIII], while they are already confirmed to be real emitters in Lya

SED fits for low-z emitters
- necessary to evaluate the efficiency of our photo-z determination to LAEs (i.e., to see the number of low-z emitter candidates with z_spec consistent with high-z LAEs)

counting the number of LAEs separately according to the number of the detected bands among YJHK (N_{NIR,detect}) and excess IA band
- this information is required because the results of the SED fitting seem to be reliable only for the LAEs with N_{NIR,detect} >= 2
- the criteria of N_{NIR,detect} >= 2 can select the LAEs w/ log10(Mstar/Msun) > 9 and Δlog10(Mstar/Msun) < 0.5 dex (see email from Y. Shioya on 2015/06/10 20:27)

evaluating SFR(UV) instead of SFR(SED)
- to make the error-bar of SFR smaller
- L_λ @ λ = 1500 +/- 150 A and E(B-V) of the best-fit model SED --[Kennicutt98 relation]--> SFR(UV)

revising Fig. 2: color-magnitude diagram
revising Fig. 3: Donley+12 criteria
revising Fig. 4: photo-z vs. spec-z
revising Fig. 5: spatial distribution of LAEs
revising Fig. 6: spatial distribution of LAEs at z=4.86 and 5.70
revising Fig. 7: EWobs distribution
revising Fig. 8: EW0 distribution
revising Fig. 9: L(Lya) distribution
revising Fig. 10: EW0--L(Lya) distribution
revising Fig. 11: EW0--Mstar distribution w/ histogram
revising Fig. 12: SFR(UV)--Mstar distribution
revising Fig. 13: sSFR distribution separated into 3 groups according to Mstar
revising Fig. 14: average SED normalized at λ = 1350 A separated into 3 panels
revising Fig. A3: flowchart for the Step 3
- criteria for the number of the undetected IA bands?
- criteria for the number of the undetected UltraVISTA/YJHK bands?
revising Fig. B1: observed SED of the strong LAEs w/ EW0 >= 100 A

Manuscript †

latest manuscript: ms_LAE_COSMOS20.pdf ms_LAE_COSMOS20.tex

Figures & Tables †

Tab. 1: Quantities Related to the Step 1 of Our Sample Selection
- comparison w/ previous Tab. 1 (2015/08/08):
- comparison w/ previous Tab. 1:
- old Tab. 1:

Tab. 2: Number of the IA-band Excess Candidates in Step 1
- comparison w/ previous Tab. 1 (2015/08/08):
- comparison w/ previous Tab. 2:
- old Tab. 2:

Tab. 3: Number of LAE candidates in Step 2
- new table (18th July, 2015):
  - this modification is caused by (1) a bug to determine z_ph of the IA-excess objects and (2) a contamination of others population into LAE because of the coincidence of z_ph
  - catalog of the LAE candidates in Step 2: &ref(): File not found: "Step2_LAEcand_all.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper";
- old table:

Tab. 4: The Adopted Parameters in Our SED Fitting in Step 3

Tab. 5: Number of LAEs in Step 3 and Step 4 and of the LAEs with EW_0 >= 100 A
- new table (25th July, 2015):
  - breakdown tables for the numbers of the individual processes in Step 3: &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step3_LAEcand_all_Nundet5.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step3_LAEcand_all_Nundet5+chinu2lteq3.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step3_LAE.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper";
  - breakdown tables for the numbers of the individual processes in Step 4: &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step4_LAE_AGN_IRAC.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step4_LAE_AGN_XMM.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step4_LAE_AGN_Chandra.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step4_LAE_AGN_VLA.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step4_LAE_AGN.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step4_LAE_nonAGN.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step4_LAE_nonAGN_sLAE.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper";
  - catalog of the LAE candidates in Step 3: &ref(): File not found: "Step3_LAEcand_all_Nundet5.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step3_LAEcand_all_Nundet5+chinu2lteq3.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step3_LAE.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper";
  - catalog of the LAE candidates in Step 4: &ref(): File not found: "Step4_LAE_AGN_IRAC.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step4_LAE_AGN_XMM.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step4_LAE_AGN_Chandra.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step4_LAE_AGN_VLA.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step4_LAE_AGN.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step4_LAE_nonAGN.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step4_LAE_nonAGN_sLAE.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper";
- old table:
- comparison w/ previous numbers:

Tab. A1: Definition of the Variables Used in Our Flowcharts for Step 1 to Step 4
- new (18th July, 2015):
- old:

Fig. A1: Flowchart for the Step 1

Fig. A2: Flowchart for the Step 2
- new (18th July, 2015):
  - this modification is motivated by the prescription used in the actual program of this Step 2; z_ph for the IA-excess candidates with Nsol >= 1 is determined essentially by using the same prescription
- old:

Fig. A3: Flowchart for the Step 3

Fig. A4: Flowchart for the Step 4

Fixed Action Items †

as of 2015/07/26 †

revising Tab. 5: number of LAEs in Step 3 and 4 and of the LAEs with EW0 >= 100 A
- done by MARK (see email from MARK on 22:20 26th July, 2015)

as of 2015/06/17 †

related to the change of selection criteria for the number of undetected IA data

On 2015/06/12 13:14, Yasuhiro Shioya wrote:
> 　LAE の選出条件を「Lyα より長波長側の IA バンドの中で検出されていない
> 　バンド数が 5未満」に改めれば、MAESTLO の数は従来のままで、ID 986273 は棄却される。
> 　＃ID 986273 は SED を見て棄却した天体なので、この天体が棄却される条件を採用
> 　この選出条件を使うと Step 3 での選出数は
> 　http://cosmos.phys.sci.ehime-u.ac.jp/~shioya/Cosmos21Ses/allLAEselection.pdf#page=6
> 　の N<5 の欄の数

に関してですが、LAE 選出条件をこのように変更することに関しては同意します。
既に今日の打ち合わせで議論があったかもしれませんが、こうすると以前の N < 6 の条件では
保たれていた、他の low-z emitter の選択条件との consistency が保たれなくなります。
他の low-z emitter でもこの条件を採用することにした場合、サンプルが変わるかどうかを
見ておくのは重要かと思いますが、こちらに関してはどのようにお考えでしょうか。

LAE の非検出IA バンド数の条件は、LAE に対してSED fitting を行って得たbest-fit model が非検出IA バンドのデータの扱いのために観測データを適切に再現していないか否かを見て決めたもの。
low-z emitters に対して同じ条件を採用する必然はなく、low-z emitters についてもbest-fit model SED と観測データとの一致具合を見て決める