[[FrontPage]] * arXiv updated version (16th July, 2015): [arXiv:1507.04439:http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.04439] [#ce492eb5] * arXiv updated version (16th July, 2015): [[arXiv:1507.04439>http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.04439]] [#ce492eb5] - in this version, there are several changes for MAESTLOs #2 & #3 from the accepted version as follows: EW0 and log10[SFR(SED)/(Msun/yr)] for MAESTLO #3 given in Tab. 1, best-fit SED for MAESTLOs #2 & #3 in Fig. 1, and position in vertical axis for MAESTLOs #2 & #3 in Fig. 2 -- these changes are caused by the bug in determination of z_ph for IA-excess objects; z_ph of the MAESTLOs #2 and #3 changes from 2.811 to 2.810 -- while the shapes of the best-fit SED models for them do not change, their normalizations do slightly decrease as follows (email from Y. Shioya on 18:43 15th July, 2015): ------------------------------------------------- normalization a(z) -------------------- No. (ID) z=2.811 z=2.810 R log R ---------------------------------------------- 2 (886686) 0.3066 0.3063 0.999 -0.0004 3 (576388) 0.1162 0.1160 0.998 -0.0007 ---------------------------------------------- R = a(z=2.810)/a(z=2.811) --- therefore, Mstar and SFR(SED) slightly decreases, EW0 slightly increases, rest-frame colors do not change at all - The IDs and (R.A., Decl.) of the 6 MAESTLOs are given in &ref(MAESTLO_RA_DEC_final.txt); ** manuscript: [#scc6923a] - pdf: &ref(ms_MAESTLO.pdf); - tex source: &ref(ms_MAESTLO.tex); - tar.gz (incl. tex source, pdf, and all figures): &ref(ms_MAESTLO_150716.tar.gz); *** Figures & Table: [#hf4b8b98] - Tab. 1: &ref(Tab1.jpg,,15%); - Tab. 2: &ref(Tab2.jpg,,50%); - Fig. 1: &ref(fig1rev.jpg,,25%); &ref(f1.eps); - Fig. 2: &ref(fig2rev.jpg,,15%); &ref(f2.eps); - Fig. 3: &ref(f3.jpg,,25%); &ref(f3.eps);