FrontPage
- Action Items Related to LAE Full Paper?
- Manuscript?
- Figures & Tables?
- Fixed Action Items?
- SED fits for low-z emitters
- necessary to evaluate the efficiency of our photo-z determination to LAEs (i.e., to see the number of low-z emitter candidates with z_spec consistent with high-z LAEs)
- counting the number of LAEs separately according to the number of the detected bands among YJHK (N_{NIR,detect}) and excess IA band
- this information is required because the results of the SED fitting seem to be reliable only for the LAEs with N_{NIR,detect} >= 2
- the criteria of N_{NIR,detect} >= 2 can select the LAEs w/ log10(Mstar/Msun) > 9 and Δlog10(Mstar/Msun) < 0.5 dex (see email from Y. Shioya on 2015/06/10 20:27)
- evaluating SFR(UV) instead of SFR(SED)
- to make the error-bar of SFR smaller
- L_λ @ λ = 1500 +/- 150 A and E(B-V) of the best-fit model SED --[Kennicutt98 relation]--> SFR(UV)
- revising Fig. 2: color-magnitude diagram
- revising Fig. 3: Donley+12 criteria
- revising Fig. 4: photo-z vs. spec-z
- revising Fig. 5: spatial distribution of LAEs
- revising Fig. 6: spatial distribution of LAEs at z=4.86 and 5.70
- revising Fig. 7: EWobs distribution
- revising Fig. 8: EW0 distribution
- revising Fig. 9: L(Lya) distribution
- revising Fig. 10: EW0--L(Lya) distribution
- revising Fig. 11: EW0--Mstar distribution w/ histogram
- revising Fig. 12: SFR(UV)--Mstar distribution
- revising Fig. 13: sSFR distribution separated into 3 groups according to Mstar
- revising Fig. 14: average SED normalized at λ = 1350 A separated into 3 panels
- revising Fig. A3: flowchart for the Step 3
- criteria for the number of the undetected IA bands?
- criteria for the number of the undetected UltraVISTA/YJHK bands?
- revising Fig. B1: observed SED of the strong LAEs w/ EW0 >= 100 A
- Tab. 1: Quantities Related to the Step 1 of Our Sample Selection
- Tab. 2: Number of the IA-band Excess Candidates in Step 1
- Tab. 3: Number of LAE candidates in Step 2
- new table (18th July, 2015):
- this modification is caused by (1) a bug to determine z_ph of the IA-excess objects and (2) a contamination of others population into LAE because of the coincidence of z_ph
- catalog of the LAE candidates in Step 2: &ref(): File not found: "Step2_LAEcand_all.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper";
- old table:
- Tab. 4: The Adopted Parameters in Our SED Fitting in Step 3
- Tab. 5: Number of LAEs in Step 3 and Step 4 and of the LAEs with EW_0 >= 100 A
- new table (25th July, 2015):
- breakdown tables for the numbers of the individual processes in Step 3: &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step3_LAEcand_all_Nundet5.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step3_LAEcand_all_Nundet5+chinu2lteq3.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step3_LAE.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper";
- breakdown tables for the numbers of the individual processes in Step 4: &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step4_LAE_AGN_IRAC.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step4_LAE_AGN_XMM.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step4_LAE_AGN_Chandra.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step4_LAE_AGN_VLA.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step4_LAE_AGN.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step4_LAE_nonAGN.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "tab-Step4_LAE_nonAGN_sLAE.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper";
- catalog of the LAE candidates in Step 3: &ref(): File not found: "Step3_LAEcand_all_Nundet5.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step3_LAEcand_all_Nundet5+chinu2lteq3.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step3_LAE.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper";
- catalog of the LAE candidates in Step 4: &ref(): File not found: "Step4_LAE_AGN_IRAC.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step4_LAE_AGN_XMM.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step4_LAE_AGN_Chandra.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step4_LAE_AGN_VLA.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step4_LAE_AGN.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step4_LAE_nonAGN.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper"; &ref(): File not found: "Step4_LAE_nonAGN_sLAE.txt" at page "LAEfullpaper";
- old table:
- comparison w/ previous numbers:
- Tab. A1: Definition of the Variables Used in Our Flowcharts for Step 1 to Step 4
- new (18th July, 2015):
- old:
- Fig. A1: Flowchart for the Step 1
- Fig. A2: Flowchart for the Step 2
- new (18th July, 2015):
- this modification is motivated by the prescription used in the actual program of this Step 2; z_ph for the IA-excess candidates with Nsol >= 1 is determined essentially by using the same prescription
- old:
- Fig. A3: Flowchart for the Step 3
- Fig. A4: Flowchart for the Step 4
as of 2015/07/26 †
- revising Tab. 5: number of LAEs in Step 3 and 4 and of the LAEs with EW0 >= 100 A
- done by MARK (see email from MARK on 22:20 26th July, 2015)
as of 2015/06/17 †
- related to the change of selection criteria for the number of undetected IA data
On 2015/06/12 13:14, Yasuhiro Shioya wrote:
> LAE の選出条件を「Lyα より長波長側の IA バンドの中で検出されていない
> バンド数が 5未満」に改めれば、MAESTLO の数は従来のままで、ID 986273 は棄却される。
> #ID 986273 は SED を見て棄却した天体なので、この天体が棄却される条件を採用
> この選出条件を使うと Step 3 での選出数は
> http://cosmos.phys.sci.ehime-u.ac.jp/~shioya/Cosmos21Ses/allLAEselection.pdf#page=6
> の N<5 の欄の数
に関してですが、LAE 選出条件をこのように変更することに関しては同意します。
既に今日の打ち合わせで議論があったかもしれませんが、こうすると以前の N < 6 の条件では
保たれていた、他の low-z emitter の選択条件との consistency が保たれなくなります。
他の low-z emitter でもこの条件を採用することにした場合、サンプルが変わるかどうかを
見ておくのは重要かと思いますが、こちらに関してはどのようにお考えでしょうか。
- LAE の非検出IA バンド数の条件は、LAE に対してSED fitting を行って得たbest-fit model が非検出IA バンドのデータの扱いのために観測データを適切に再現していないか否かを見て
決めたもの。
- low-z emitters に対して同じ条件を採用する必然はなく、low-z emitters についてもbest-fit model SED と観測データとの一致具合を見て決める
FrontPage